Efficacy of diltiazem 2% rectal gel in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the effectiveness and safety of a magistral formulation of diltiazem 2% rectal gel as a treatment for chronic anal fissure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study of all patients that began treatment with diltiazem 2% gel during 2019. The primary endpoint of the study was anal fissure healing. We also looked for differences in effectiveness between those initiating treatment and those who had been previously treated, long-term effectiveness through a 2-year follow-up and frequency of adverse effects. RESULTS: Of the 166 patients included in the study, anal fissure healed in 72.9%. We detected adverse effects in 12 patients, the most common was local irritation. After 2 years of follow-up, 88% of patients did not relapse. CONCLUSION: In this study, use of topical diltiazem 2% has been shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of anal fissure and should be considered as the first line of therapy.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es describir la efectividad y la seguridad de una fórmula magistral de diltiazem 2% gel rectal, como tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Un studio observacional retrospectivo de todos los pacientes que comenzaron a ser tratados con diltiazem 2% gel durante el año 2019. La variable principal del estudio fue la cicatrización de la fisura anal. También se buscaron diferencias de efectividad entre aquellos que iniciaban el tratamiento y los que ya habían sido tratados previamente, efectividad a largo plazo mediante un seguimiento de 2 años y frecuencia de aparición de efectos adversos. RESULTADOS: De los 166 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, el 72,9% cicatrizaron la fisura anal. No detectamos diferencias estadísticamente significativas de efectividad entre los pacientes naive y aquellos que ya habían sido tratados. Detectamos efectos adversos en 12 pacientes, siendo el más frecuente la irritación local. Tras 2 años de seguimiento, el 88% de los pacientes no presentaron ninguna recaída. CONCLUSIÓN: En este estudio, el uso de diltiazem 2% tópico ha mostrado ser efectivo y seguro en el tratamiento de la fisura anal y debería considerarse como primera línea terapéutica.

Botulinum toxin injection in outpatients for chronic anal fissure.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of botulinum toxin (BT) injection on fissure healing in the treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF) in outpatient conditions without any analgesia and sedation to the internal anal sphincter (IAS). The primary outcome measure was post-procedural pain. The secondary outcome measures were fissure healing and complications. METHODS: Prospectively preserved data of 67 patients who received BT injections for CAF were analyzed prospectively. Demographic data, duration of symptomatic improvement, fissure location and number, parity, post-procedural pain, complications, continence status, response to treatment, and duration of follow-up were examined. Participants received bilateral (50 + 50 units) BT injections into the internal anal sphincter (IAS) in an outpatient setting. RESULTS: Symptomatic improvement was observed in 58% of patients within 1 week. The complete response rate to treatment was 82% at a mean follow-up of 6 months. Patients with partial response to treatment (10%) were successfully treated with topical therapy, and patients with persisting fissures (8%) were successfully treated with partial lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). 14 patients (21%) reported some degree of transient incontinence at follow-up. Multiparous women experienced more symptoms of Incontinence (p = 0.00). Pre- and post-procedural Vas Score median values were 4. The 7th-week VAS score median value was 3. CONCLUSION: Dysport injection under sedation-free outpatient conditions is an effective and safe alternative to LIS for the treatment of CAF, with tolerable procedural pain. All patients should be warned of transient incontinence.

Surgeons' practice and preferences for the anal fissure treatment: results from an international survey.

The best nonoperative or operative anal fissure (AF) treatment is not yet established, and several options have been proposed. Aim is to report the surgeons' practice for the AF treatment. Thirty-four multiple-choice questions were developed. Seven questions were about to participants' demographics and, 27 questions about their clinical practice. Based on the specialty (general surgeon and colorectal surgeon), obtained data were divided and compared between two groups. Five-hundred surgeons were included (321 general and 179 colorectal surgeons). For both groups, duration of symptoms for at least 6 weeks is the most important factor for AF diagnosis (30.6%). Type of AF (acute vs chronic) is the most important factor which guide the therapeutic plan (44.4%). The first treatment of choice for acute AF is ointment application for both groups (59.6%). For the treatment of chronic AF, this data is confirmed by colorectal surgeons (57%), but not by the general surgeons who prefer the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) (31.8%) (p = 0.0001). Botulin toxin injection is most performed by colorectal surgeons (58.7%) in comparison to general surgeons (20.9%) (p = 0.0001). Anal flap is mostly performed by colorectal surgeons (37.4%) in comparison to general surgeons (28.3%) (p = 0.0001). Fissurectomy alone is statistically significantly most performed by general surgeons in comparison to colorectal surgeons (57.9% and 43.6%, respectively) (p = 0.0020). This analysis provides useful information about the clinical practice for the management of a debated topic such as AF treatment. Shared guidelines and consensus especially focused on operative management are required to standardize the treatment and to improve postoperative results.

The effect of Caudal Epidural Injection on healing in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic anal fissure is called the reaching the muscle layer under the skin by deepening of the fissure in the breech skin. Our purpose is to enable the tissue to heal by relaxing the anal sphincter with caudal epidural injection. METHODS: One hundred twenty cases were included in this randomized, controlled study. The cases were categorized into 2 groups; Under ultrasound guidance, the first group, caudal epidural injection group (Group CE, n = 60) was treated with 5 cc bupivakain + 5 cc isotonic from a caudal epidural for a total of 3 sessions at the beginning, 1 week and 2 weeks later; the second group, control group (Group C, n = 60) were provided medical treatment (cream, pill etc.) every day for 2 weeks. Wexner's constipation score was used to assess constipation severity and visual analog scale was used to assess pain severity. Short Form-36 was used to determine the patient's quality of life. RESULTS: This study was conducted with 2 groups of 60 people and a total of 120 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics (age, body mass index, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist, mean blood pressure, heart rate) (P > .05). Out of the detected fissures, 32 (26.7%) were located anteriorly and 88 (73.3%) were located posteriorly. The groups were statistically same in terms of fissure location (P = .423). When groups were compared with pain, Wexner constipation and visual analog scale scores decreased significantly in Group CE compared to Group C after 2.and 3.sessions (P = .001 and P = .002, respectively). In Group CE, the Short Form-36 subscales increased significantly (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Caudal epidural injection has a potential to be an alternative treatment option for chronic anal fissure.

The Value of Injection Therapy with Botulinum Toxin in Pain Treatment of Primary Chronic Anal Fissures Compared to Anal Dilation, and Local Nifedipine in Combination with Lidocaine.

Introduction: Anal fissure is a longitudinal tear of the mucosa of the anal canal extending from the outer anal orifice in the direction of the dentate line of the inner anal opening. Fissures are divided into primary and secondary, and acute or chronic. Besides minimal rectal bleeding, itching and soiling, primary chronic anal fissures (PCAF) manifest with anal pain as theirs main determinant. It is described as the most troubling symptom. Aim: To compare the effect of injection therapy with botulinum toxin A (ITBT) vs. anal dilation (AD), and local nifedipine with lidocaine (LNL) in pain treatment of PCAF. Materials and Methods: This controlled retrospective prospective longitudinal study covered 94 patients, divided in 3 groups. The first was treated with ITBT, the second with AD and third using LNL (31, 33 and 30 patients respectively). Clostridium botulinum toxin A was used, dissolved with saline to concentration of 200 U/ml. The solution was applied to both sides of PCAF at dose of 40U. Modified technique of AD was done using 3 fingers of a single hand, progressively introduced into the anal canal, followed by gradual lateral distraction during 1 min. LNL therapy was conducted using nifedipine (0.3%) with lidocaine (1.5%) ointment, applied twice daily for 3 weeks. To measure pain, a visual analog scale (VAS) was used. The follow-up period was 12 weeks with checkup at week 4. Results: The median age of participants was 46.6±13.9 years (50 males vs. 44 females). The type of therapy had a significantly different effect on pain at week 4 (p=0.0003). Severe pain was present in only 2 ITBT patients, 16 AD, and 6 LNL patients. Post hoc analyses showed different pain disappearance time by week 12 (p <0.0001). The mean time was shortest in ITBT group (6.1±1.5 weeks). Anal pain intensity significantly differed among the 3 groups (Fisher exact, p=0.002). Namely, 71% in ITBT group rated the pain as weakest (VAS score 1) compared to 18.2% in AD and 30% of patients in LNL group. The overall pain reduction significance was in favor of ITBT, due to the differences between the ITBT and AD groups (p=0.00024) and ITBT compared to LNL group (p=0.018). Conclusion: ITBT is superior to AD and LNL in reducing pain in PCAF.

Platelet-rich plasma improves acute and chronic anal fissure, a randomized control trial.

Anal fissure is one of the most prevalent diagnosis in patients with anorectal symptoms. Depending on the chronicity, treatment choices vary, from topical and conservative management to operative ones. PRP is a blood-derived product with a three to five-fold platelet count and can be used for restorative purposes. The objective of this study is to assess the therapeutic effect of intralesional PRP in acute and chronic anal fissures and comparing it with the classic topical approach. We included 94 patients with acute and chronic anal fissures and divided them into intervention and control groups. Control patients were treated only with topical compounds, and the intervention group received one dose of intralesional autologous PRP plus the same classic treatment. We assessed patients 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months later. The mean pain score in the intervention group was significantly lower than control groups in all visits (p-value <0.001). During the follow-ups, the bleeding rate was significantly lower in the intervention group, so in the sixth month, the bleeding was 4% in the intervention group against 32% of the control (p-value <0.001). The healing rate assessed by examination was 96% in the intervention group against 66% in the control in the sixth month (p-value <0.001). Although there may be no significant difference in healing rate between groups in the acute anal fissure, the PRP group is significantly superior in the chronic setting. We concluded that in anal fissure treatment, PRP plus topical products are significantly superior to alone topical treatment.

Mucosal vs. cutaneous advancement flaps for the treatment of chronic anal fissures: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare two surgical treatment methods for chronic anal fissures (CAF), mucosal advancement flap anoplasty (MAFA) and cutaneous advancement flap anoplasty (CAFA). METHODS: A randomized, blinded clinical trial was conducted on patients with CAF refractory to medical treatment referred to a tertiary-level hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. The patients were assigned to two groups by block randomization and were compared in terms of outcome, pain reduction, and complications. RESULTS: There were 30 patients (male to female ratio 2:3, median age 42 years [range 25-59 years]). Both techniques reduced anal pain significantly (p = 0.001); however, there were no significant differences between MAFA and CAFA groups in recurrence, duration of healing, postoperative pain, and postoperative bleeding. No patient suffered from fecal incontinence (Wexner score = 0) or flap necrosis postoperatively. Only two patients in the MAFA group (1 and 3 months after surgery) and one patient in the CAFA group (2 months after surgery) had recurrence (total recurrence rate = 10%, healing rate = 90%). All of the patients were satisfied with their surgical results. CONCLUSION: Mucosal and cutaneous anal advancement flap techniques are effective and comparable surgical procedures for the treatment of chronic anal fissures with minimal complications, fast healing process, and minimal postoperative pain and complications. CLINICAL TRIAL ID: IRCT20120129008861N4 ( www.irct.ir ).

Efficacy and safety of Propionibacterium extract gel versus glyceryl trinitrate ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is an extremely frequent finding in clinical practice. Several topical agents have been proposed for its treatment with the common goal of increasing anodermal blood flow to promote healing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a Propionibacterium extract gel (PeG) and 0.4% glyceryl trinitrate ointment (GTN) in patients with CAF. METHOD: Patients were randomly allocated to a PeG or GTN group and medication was administered every 12 h for 40 days. The primary outcome was the success rate, as measured by a decrease in the REALISE scoring system for anal fissure at 10, 20 and 40 days after initiating either treatment. The secondary outcomes recorded at the same time points were healing rate, visual analogue scales for itching and burning, rate of complications and adverse events, patient quality of life and satisfaction, and cost analysis. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled, and 96 patients (PeG, n = 53; GTN, n = 43) completed the primary outcomes. A significant decrease over time in the REALISE score was observed in both groups. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the GTN group than in the PeG group, peaking at visit 1 [37 (63.8%) vs. 2 (3.4%), respectively], with headache being the most prevalent. The between-treatment cumulative average costs per patient were significantly higher for GTN than that for PeG at each follow-up visit. There were no other significant differences between the two groups for any of the other outcomes. CONCLUSION: While there was no difference in healing rates between the two treatments, PeG was more cost-effective and associated with fewer adverse events.

Clinical Outcomes of Medical Management Options for Chronic Anal Fissures in a Long-Term Follow-up: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Topical treatments and botulinum toxin injections are valid options for the management of patients with chronic anal fissures (CAF), but little is known about the efficacy of these techniques in long-term follow-up. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness, given to clinical outcomes, of medical treatments with calcium antagonists, nitroglycerin, and botulinum toxin on CAF treatment in adults. METHOD: A systemic review and meta-analysis developed according to PRISMA [PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100; BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332] and registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42020120386). A systematic literature search was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized control trials that compared medical treatment were identified; publications had to have a clinical definition of CAF with at least one of the following signs or symptoms: visible sphincter fibers at the base of the fissure, anal papillae, sentinel piles, and indurated margins. The symptoms had to be chronic for at least 4 weeks. Data were independently extracted for each study, and a meta-analysis was drawn using fixed- and random-effects models. RESULTS: 17 randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. Diltiazem showed a superior effect compared with glycerin (RR = 1.16 [95% CI = 1.05-1.30]; I2 = 18%) and with fewer adverse effects (RR = 0.13 [95% CI = 0.04-0.042]; I2 = 87%). Similar results were evidenced with the use of nifedipine compared with lidocaine (RR = 4.53 [95% CI = 2.99-6.86]; I2 = 28%). Botulinum toxin did not show statistically significant differences compared to glycerin (RR = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.02-29.36]; I2 = 93%) or isosorbide dinitrate (RR = 1.45 [95% CI = 0.32-6.54]; I2 = 85%). Regarding recurrence, nifedipine was superior to lidocaine (RR = 0.18 [95% CI = 0.08-0.44]; I2 = 31%). CONCLUSIONS: Calcium channel blockers performed well regarding the healing of CAF when compared to others in long-term follow-up. The superiority of botulinum toxin was not evidenced compared to topical treatments. More studies are needed to better assess recurrence rates.

Pelvic floor physical therapy in patients with chronic anal fissure: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic anal fissure is a common benign anorectal disease with a high recurrence rate. Pelvic floor physical therapy has been proven effective in the short-term management in patients with chronic anal fissure and pelvic floor dysfunction (PAF-trial). The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of the PAF-trial and fissure recurrence in patients who completed the 2 months of pelvic floor physical therapy at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Electromyographic registration of the pelvic floor, digital rectal examination, visual analog scales, patient-related outcome measurements, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and at 1-year after inclusion. The primary outcome was muscle tone at rest during electromyographic registration of the pelvic floor at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes contained fissure recurrence, pain ratings, pelvic floor dysfunction, complaint reduction measured with a proctology specific patient-reported outcome measurement, and quality of life. RESULTS: The treatment protocol was followed by 137 patients. Ninety-seven patients (71%) completed the 1-year follow-up, 48 women (49.5%) and 49 men (50.5%) with a mean age of 44.4 ± 11.6 years (range 19-68). In the total group of patients, mean resting electromyographic values of the pelvic floor significantly improved from baseline to follow-up at 1 year (mean estimated difference 2.20 µV; 95% CI, 1.79 to 2.61; p < 0.001). After 1 year, the fissure recurred in 15 patients (15.5%). VAS-pain significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up (mean estimated difference 4.16; 95% CI, 3.75 to 4.58; p < 0.001). Dyssynergia was found in 72.9% at baseline and decreased to 14.4% at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Complaint reduction measured with the Proctoprom significantly improved from baseline to 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Quality of life (RAND-36) significantly improved in eight of nine domains at 1-year follow-up. No significant improvement was found in the domain vitality. CONCLUSIONS: In the PAF-trial, we demonstrated that pelvic floor physical therapy yields a significant and clinical benefit in the time course and therefore should be advocated as adjuvant conservative treatment in patients with chronic anal fissure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at the Dutch Trial registry (NTR7581)  https://trialsearch.who.int.

Case Report of Anal Fissures and Hemorrhoids Treated with Compounded Cromolyn Sodium and Naltrexone Hydrochloride in MEDISCA's SPG SUPPOSI-BASE.

The purpose of this case report is to evaluate and demonstrate the benefits of compounded therapy in treating chronic rectal fissures with hemorrhoids using a compounded suppository containing cromolyn sodium and naltrexone hydrochloride in MEDISCA's SPG SUPPOSI-BASE. The primary outcomes of symptomatic improvement and healed fissure were reported and confirmed by the practitioner and, via self-assessment, by the patient, which was observed after a long-troubled history of failed treatments. The case had no side effects or complications, and the patient reported a full recovery after using this compounded therapy for ten days.

Botulinum toxin injection is an effective alternative for the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

OBJECTIVES: There are few published data on the optimized use of botulinum toxin A (BTA) for the treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of injection of 100 IU BTA into the internal anal sphincter (IAS) at the side opposite of the fissure, using an anal retractor, sedation, and perianal transcutaneous pudendal nerve block. METHODS: The prospectively maintained data of 132 patients who underwent BTA injection for CAF were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, symptom duration, fissure location, post-procedure pain, complications, continence status, response to treatment, and follow-up period were investigated. Postoperative analgesic requirements of patients who did and did not receive pudendal nerve block were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were male and the median age was 40 (18-74) years. Sixty-six patients required no, 46 required oral, and 20 required parenteral analgesics. No complications were observed. Complete response was observed in 105 patients (79.5%). Symptomatic improvement was observed in 67.4% of patients within 3-7 d. Median follow-up was 24 (18-42) months. The median Wexner's incontinence score was 0 (0-8) at 1 month. In all, 104 patients had no, 22 patients had minor, and 6 patients had non-minor incontinence. All patients with incontinence recovered fully within 4 (2-13) weeks. CONCLUSIONS: BTA injection using an anal retractor under sedation and perianal transcutaneous pudendal nerve block is an effective and safe alternative to partial lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) for the treatment of CAF.

L-Arginine is a feasible supplement to heal chronic anal fissure via reducing internal anal sphincter pressure: a randomized clinical trial study.

The hypertonicity of internal anal sphincter resting pressure is one of the main causes of chronic anal fissure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of oral administration of L-arginine on the improvement of the anal fissures by relaxing the internal anal sphincter. Seventy-six chronic anal fissure patients (aged 18-65 years) who were referred to Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran from February 2019 to October 2020 participated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were allocated into treatment (L-arginine) and placebo groups. They took a 1000 mg capsule three times a day for 1 month, and then we followed them at the end of the first and third months after the intervention. Clinical symptoms, anal sphincter resting pressure, and quality of life (QoL) were completed at baseline and the end of the study. The analysis of data showed a significant decrease in bleeding, fissure size, and pain for each group; however, in the L-arginine group was more than the control group at the end of the study (P values < 0.001). Following that, a significant increase in QoL was seen just in patients treated with L-arginine (P value = 0.006). In addition, the comparison of anal pressures at baseline and, between groups at the end of the study showed a significant reduction in sphincter pressure in patients treated with L-arginine (P value < 0.001, = 0.049; respectively). The oral administration of 3000 mg L-arginine can heal chronic anal fissures by reducing internal anal sphincter pressure with more negligible side effects. However, we recommend long-term study with more extended follow-up.Clinical trial registry: IRCT20190712044182N1 at Iranian clinical trials, date: 2019-08-27.

Does Adding a Fissurectomy to Botox Sphincterotomy Increase Success Rate or Just Cost?

BACKGROUND: While Botox sphincterotomy with or without fissurectomy has been proven effective in healing anal fissures, they have not been directly compared. We evaluated cost-effectiveness and outcomes between Botox sphincterotomies with and without fissurectomy. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review was conducted comparing all patients undergoing Botox sphincterotomy for anal fissure with or without fissurectomy. Outcomes including recurrence/persistence, additional treatments, complications, and total charges were compared between study groups. RESULTS: Patients treated without fissurectomy (n = 53) had recurrent/persistent fissure more often (56.6 vs 31.0%, P = .001), and required more Botox treatments. Those treated with fissurectomy (n = 154) had more complications (13.5 vs 0%, P = .003). Patients initially treated without fissurectomy had a median total charge of $2 973, while median total charge for those initially treated with fissurectomy was $17 925 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Botox sphincterotomy in an office without fissurectomy is a viable option. It may result in longer healing times but is associated with reduced cost, lower complication rates, and no need for anesthesia or operative intervention in most cases. But the choice of treatment route must be individualized.

Use of Botulinum Toxin Injections for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Results From an American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Survey.

BACKGROUND: Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is commonly treated by colorectal surgeons. Pharmacological treatment is considered first-line therapy. An alternative treatment modality is chemical sphincterotomy with injection of botulinum toxin (BT). However, there is a lack of a consensus on the BT administration procedure among colorectal surgeons. METHODS: A national survey approved by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) Executive Council was sent to all members. An eight-question survey was sent via ASCRS email correspondence between December 2019 and February 2020. Questions were derived from available meta-analyses and expert opinions on BT use in CAF patients and included topics such as BT dose, injection technique, and concomitant therapies. The survey was voluntary and anonymous, and all ASCRS members were eligible to complete it. Responses were recorded and analyzed via an online survey platform. RESULTS: 216 ASCRS members responded to the survey and 90% inject 50-100U of BT. Most procedures are performed under MAC anesthesia (56%). A majority of respondents (64%) inject into the internal sphincter and a majority (53%) inject into 4 quadrants in the anal canal circumference. Some respondents perform concomitant manual dilatation (34%) or fissurectomy (38%). Concomitant topical muscle relaxing agents are not used uniformly among respondents. DISCUSSION: Injection of BT for CAF is used commonly by colorectal surgeons. There is consensus on BT dosage, administration site, technique, and the use of monitored anesthesia care.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoanal Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin in Chronic Anal Fissure.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoanal ultrasound (EAUS)-guided botulinum toxin (BT) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF). All patients were classified into 2 groups: conventional and EAUS groups. In total, 90 units of BT were injected into the internal anal sphincter at the 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions in the EAUS group. An injection was performed into the intersphincteric space at the 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions in the conventional group. Adverse effects and efficacy were analyzed. There were 44 patients: 26 in the conventional group and 18 in the EAUS group. Pain and incontinence rates were similar between groups (P > .05). The efficacy rate was higher in the EAUS group (69.23%) than in the conventional group (81.82%), but this difference was not significant (P = .466). EAUS-guided BT injection is safe and effective in patients with CAFs.

Clinical Outcome of 0.2% Glyceryl Trinitrate Topical Ointment Compared to Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Patient with Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Control Trial.

The objective of study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of topical 0.2% Glyceryl trinitrate topical (GTN) ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. This randomized control trial was carried out in the Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh from May 2015 to April 2016. Total 94 patients were included in this trial, where 47(50.0%) patients were treated by 0.2% GTN ointment as Trial group 12 hourly for 8 weeks and 47(50.0%) patients by lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) as Control group in this study. Patients were randomized in two groups by lottery following purposive sampling. Post-procedural outcome variables with 6 months follow up were evaluated. Majority of the patients were found in between 20 to 40 years of age in both groups. The mean age was 34.6±10.4 years and 33.2±8.6 years in GTN and LIS respectively. Overall male female ratio was 0.88:1. All (100.0%) patients presented with pain in anus and 86.15% patients presented with per rectal bleeding. Pain relief in GTN arm versus LIS arm in 2nd and 6th week was 55.31% vs. 76.6%, 74.5% vs. 87.23% with no significant difference between two groups. But at 6 month it was 57.44% vs. 93.6% respectively. The fall in pain relief at 6th month in GTN arm was due to recurrence of fissure. At the end of 2nd, 6th week and 6month, cessation of bleeding improved gradually in both groups after treatment but the improvement was significantly better in LIS group than in GTN group indicating sphincterotomy stops bleeding better. Healing after 2nd week in both groups was minimum but equal 2(4.26%) patients. After 6 weeks LIS group had significant better healing than GTN 40(85.1%) versus 26(55.3%) with p value <0.001. In 6 month time GTN group had increased healing but LIS group had significant better healing than GTN group 42(89.36) vs. 32(68.08) with p value 0.004. Transient flatus and liquid incontinence were 8.51% and 6.4% respectively in LIS group with 0.0% in GTN group. Headache and recurrence were significantly higher in GTN group 61.7% and 34.04% with p<0.001. Lateral internal anal sphincterotomy is superior to the topical application of 0.2% nitroglycerin ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure with the advantages of good symptomatic relief, high rate of healing and a very low rate of transient continence disturbances.

Botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: uni- and multivariate analysis of the factors that promote healing.

PURPOSE: Anal fissure is caused by a pathological contraction of the internal anal sphincter. Lateral internal sphincterotomy remains the gold standard for the treatment of fissure. Botulinum toxin injections have been proposed to treat this condition without any risk of permanent injury of the internal sphincter. We investigate clinical and pathological variables and the effects of different dosage regimens of botulinum toxin to induce healing in patients with idiopathic anal fissure. METHODS: This is a retrospective study at a single center. The patients underwent a pre-treatment evaluation that included clinical inspection of the fissure and anorectal manometry. We collected and analyzed demographic data, pathological variables, associated pathological conditions, and treatment variables. Success was defined as healing of the fissure, and improvement of symptoms was defined as asymptomatic persistent fissure. RESULTS: The findings of 1003 patients treated with botulinum toxin injections were reported. At 2 months evaluation, complete healing was evident in 780 patients (77.7%). Resting anal tone (77.1 ± 18.9 mmHg) was significantly lower from baseline (P < 0.0001) and from 1-month value (P = 0.0008). Thirty-nine not healed patients underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy, and 184 were re-treated with 50 UI of botulinum toxin. In these patients, the healing rate was 93.9% (171 patients). Dose and injection site of toxin correlates with healing rate. There were no relapses during an average of about 71 months. CONCLUSION: Our data show that injection of botulinum toxin into the internal anal sphincter is a safe and effective alternative to surgery in patients with chronic anal fissure.